“I am. For that reason, I was not. If I was not, after that something came prior to me. If something came prior to me, I am compelled to ask what that something is.”
This is where all recognizing starts.
I. The First Split
Before mathematics. Prior to science. Prior to language.
There is a solitary, irreducible experience:
Self-awareness.
The moment a being realizes it exists– as something separate from its surroundings– something basic occurs.
The infinite intricacy of presence is cut down right into a single, knowable point : “I am.”
This is not just a concept. It’s the initial act of psychological decrease — the mind organizing chaotic experience into a secure shape.
This process of simplifying raw experience into usable structure is what I indicate when I state:
Compression.
And this very first compression– this very first cut– triggers identification.
It gives rise to 1
But the realization of “I am” lugs a shadow:
If I am …
I may not have actually been.
This recognition of lack, of what can have not existed, generates 0
So 0 and 1 aren’t simply numbers.
They are the very first psychological categories created when a mind decreases limitless experience right into functional signals.
They are the beginning of every little thing we later on call logic, mathematics, and significance.
II. What I In fact Mean by “Compression”
When I state compression, I don’t mean diminishing.
I imply:
The act of decreasing raw experience into patterns the mind can identify, bear in mind, and deal with.
You don’t regard every leaf on every tree. You regard “a woodland.”
You don’t relive every minute of a day. You bear in mind “a good day” or “a bad conversation.”
You do not live as an infinite, undefined being. You live as “you.”
That process– of filtering system frustrating truth right into something smaller, more structured, and easier to navigate — is what I mean by compression.
It’s what all assumption does.
It’s what all language does.
It’s what all cognition does.
It doesn’t reveal you the complete fact
It provides you a version of truth you can lug.
III. Where Mathematics In Fact Comes From
From the minute we create 1 (self) and 0 (lack), the building blocks of mathematics unravel:
- 2 is born when we acknowledge an additional existence not ourselves.
- 3 becomes the partnership between things.
- 10 emerges when we discover to abstract quantity across time.
Yet these are not discoveries floating in space.
They are the outcomes of minds carving structure out of turmoil
Penrose, for example, argues that math is an independent truth– something eternal, uncovered rather than developed.
But if that were true, exactly how come every circumstances of math has just ever been understood, shared, or confirmed with the workings of a mind
You can not divide math from the act of aware company
Which means mathematics is not “out there.”
It’s how our minds organize what we see out there
It is a device of compression– not of the file-storage kind, however of the psychological kind : minimizing intricacy into tidy rules that match our restrictions.
IV. The Limits of Mathematical Reality
Penrose is surprised at just how well mathematics explains the universe– how accurately it versions electrons, worlds, gravity.
Yet here’s what that truly implies:
Mathematics is the very best psychological framework we have actually developed to stand for patterns we can observing.
That does not confirm mathematics is the foundation of the universe
It verifies that mathematics is the most effective device our minds have for filtering reality into types we can utilize.
Currently look outside.
All across life in the world– from insects to dolphins to microorganisms– organisms are connecting with truth.
They reply to risk. They pursue food. They browse the globe.
However we have no idea if they are filtering the world utilizing anything remotely like what we call mathematics
It’s not that they’re using “much less mathematics.”
It’s that they might be using a totally different framework to make sense of experience– something past anything we also recognize as reasoning.
So when a person claims “the universe is mathematical,” what they really indicate is:
“It behaves mathematically when infiltrated human cognition.
That’s not axiom.
That’s species-specific structure — a result of how our minds minimize complexity into graspable versions
V. Science as a System of Mental Filtering
Science is improved predictability and repeatability.
It provides us versions that function.
However science is still a human product. It’s still shaped by how we reduce the globe right into domino effect
Scientific research is a system of organized compression:
- We observe complexity
- We produce signs to represent it
- We examine those signs
- We upgrade the design when they quit working
However other creatures don’t require that system to make it through.
They aren’t running experiments.
They aren’t confirming equations.
They’re reacting to the world via different scaffolds.
If they can thrive without mathematics–
That need to make us examine whether math is the source of truth
… or simply our method of enduring it.
VI. Why Accuracy Does Not Mean Truth
Penrose celebrates math’s precision.
Einstein’s equations predicted points we hadn’t yet observed– and they were right.
However this still doesn’t prove mathematics is the resource of truth.
It shows that math happens to match the components of truth we can modeling
That’s not ontology. That’s user interface.
We love the Mandelbrot set. Infinite fractals from a basic equation.
However possibly what we enjoy is not the reality of it — yet the fact that it compresses perfectly
Simply put:
We do not praise math because it’s genuine.
We worship it since it makes intricacy really feel neat
However suppose reality isn’t neat?
What if math is a glove– and truth is the hand we’re attempting to grasp?
VII. Exactly how This Brings about the Concept of God
If I exist (1– and I can imagine not existing (0)–
then I need something to discuss exactly how I crossed that line
That demand doesn’t come from religion.
It comes from the method the mind attempts to minimize unresolvable unpredictability right into something it can carry.
God is not put as a shortcut.
God is what arises when our psychological decrease strikes a wall surface
It is the placeholder we make use of when our versions can not go better.
That doesn’t make God false.
It makes God an inevitable outcome of minds trying to answer inquiries bigger than their framework can fix.
VIII. The Opening in Penrose’s Argument
Penrose says mathematics exists beyond us– that we’re uncovering something that’s always been “out there.”
But the problem is:
All explorations are infiltrated assumption.
There is no such thing as a reality that misses the mind
Even “outside fact” just exists in the means our cognition lets us refine it.
So to say mathematics exists independently of consciousness– when no variation of math has ever appeared outside of awareness– is a leap.
It’s not logic. It’s idea.
Penrose blunders exactly how clean the design is for evidence that it’s fundamental
But sanitation is not evidence of source.
It’s just evidence of a version that matches our own filter.
IX. The Wider Ramification
We believe we’re discovering reality.
But we’re actually organizing perception.
- Mathematics is our device for suitable intricacy right into convenient form.
- Scientific research is our method of testing which versions endure comments.
- Awareness is eviction through which every one of this passes.
That indicates fact, as we know it , is constantly filteringed system– always pressed– constantly limited by what the viewer can handle.
And if various other beings are filtering the globe differently …
After that fact isn’t mathematics.
It’s larger than mathematics — and math is simply our edge of the room.
X. Final Reflection
Whatever you think you recognize–
is a design. A mapping. A mental decrease.
It doesn’t imply you’re wrong.
It indicates you’re bounded
We’re not seeing fact.
We’re shaping it right into types we can bring–
and calling those forms “fact.”
So the question is not whether math is genuine.
The question is:
What else is available … that does not fit into math in any way?
And if we agree to admit that–
After that we can stop venerating the version
And begin humbling ourselves before the secret.